Wednesday, October 8

🌟 Today’s Highlights:

• X Premium subscribers get significantly more reach

• Threads launched interest groups for users

• Still trusting ChatGPT to write your copy?

• 📊 Stat of the Day: Global social media usage has dropped 10% since 2022. (Source: Financial Times)

• 💡 Today’s Insight: Are your competitors training AI to misrepresent your brand?

✍️ 💸 AI Saved You Money. But At What Cost?

AI is a great drafting tool, but hitting “publish” without quality assurance is a rookie mistake.

Proofed is the editorial team behind the scenes, making sure your content is:

✅ Human-checked for accuracy

✅ On-brand and error-free

✅ Delivered on time, every time

Scale your content operation without sacrificing the quality that builds trust. Book your 30-day trial →

⚡️ Today’s Headlines ⚡️

📈 New data shows that X premium subscribers are seeing 10x more reach on average in the app. An analysis of 18.8M posts showed that Premium+ accounts get over 1,550 impressions per post while basic tier users receive fewer than 100.

❌ Fix These 6 Direct Mail Mistakes Now. Learn the 6 blind spots that keep direct mail from driving ROI, and see how to build an executive-ready dashboard that shows clear pipeline impact. Register now →

🫰Google is putting “Incentivized Review” labels on product reviews in shopping results. It’s unclear if this applies to all retailer reviews or just certain input methods, but it could affect trust signals regardless.

📚 Steal Audible's $440,000,000/yr Marketing Strategy, now streaming on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple

🧵Meta just rolled out topic-based communities to all users on Threads. If you’ve already tagged interests on your profile, you’re automatically added to the communities, although you can opt out of them at any time.

💡 Today’s Insight 💡

Are your competitors training AI to misrepresent your brand?

🗞 TL;DR - It’s a known fact that AI systems (LLMs) are pattern predictors, not truth machines. But that opens a new threat vector: directed bias attacks, where malicious actors flood the web with content that influences how AI describes your brand. Over time, that distortion can become the “default” narrative delivered by AI, even if it's false.

💡 Insight - Here are the key risks for marketers and brand teams:

1. Data poisoning/content flooding. A volume of similar claims (like reviews, blog posts, and forum mentions) can teach the model that those claims are “normal” or canonical, even if they’re false. If bad claims get repeated enough, AI assistants may surface them as facts.
   

2. Competitive content squatting/narrative steering. Publishing “Why Vendor X exaggerates results” pages or “alternatives to Brand Y” can bias how AI frames your brand. You may lose narrative control in AI answer boxes or branded queries.
   

3. Semantic misdirection. Attackers don’t mention your brand directly, but associate your category with negative terms (e.g., “unethical AI marketing,” “inflated metrics”) repeatedly. You get guilt by context, even if you’re never named.
   

4. Authority hijacking/fake attribution. Fake quotes, false reports, or misattributed “expert” claims get published and then picked up by AI as trustworthy sources. AI repeats them as truth, making them harder to displace.
   

5. Prompt manipulation/injection. Hidden cues or instructions can be embedded in content or contributions that nudge AI to favor a particular framing when processing it later. Users might never see manipulation, but the AI is subtly guided to output biased descriptions.

🔑 Takeaway - The risk is no longer only what appears in search results. It’s what AI says about you when users never click out. Directed bias attacks are subtle, scalable, and hard to correct. The brands that survive will be those that actively defend their narrative in the opaque layer between user and information.

5️⃣ Ways I Can Help You ↙️

Grow you a cult following 📈 
Crazy affordable SEO 🔎 
Generate you a sh*t ton of leads 🙏🏼
10 Minute marketing nuggets 🎙️
Advertise your biz to my audience 📣